WWMT’s portrayal of PN is unfair, biased
September 25, 2017
Portage Northern High School is a place where every year, a diverse group of students are nominated by their peers to be on homecoming court. It is also a place where just three days ago, one of those students, a senior with special educational needs, was voted senior homecoming king by his classmates. It is not a place where students, teachers, and administration turn a blind eye to bullying, as alleged by WWMT News.
As a trusted local news source, WWMT crossed a boundary with their news coverage this past week. The articles about the supposed bullying of a special education student reflected a lack of research and reporting, giving insufficient and incomplete information to the readers and lacking journalistic substance. No concrete evidence was employed to support any of the accusations, especially those most severe: that the school was trying to ignore a serious bullying issue and silence the students who were seeking justice. While district representatives offered honest and professional insights, News 3 seemed to intentionally interview and quote certain people more than the district. The end result is a story that is far from the fair and balanced news writing that even high school journalists like ourselves aspire to.
To put it bluntly, the writing in these articles, which is intended to uncover what could have been a serious issue had any hard evidence ever come to light, is pedestrian at best. “Maybe” this and “probably” that are neither indicative of professional journalism nor something one would expect from a news outlet as trusted as WWMT. Not only that, but our staff found that the headlines were misleading and did not match the actual content of the articles. “Students at Portage Northern say they’re in trouble for sticking up for bullied student” is one of these headlines, whereas the actual article only addresses the instance of one student receiving a potential disciplinary consequence. This punishment was actually issued for violating the Student Code of Conduct, not simply “sticking up for the student being bullied” as implied. While that fact is mentioned in passing in the story, the author still chose to pursue a different, much more accusatory angle that was directly contradicted by the facts in the situation.
By leading with headlines that seethed bias and only reporting one side of the story, WWMT portrayed Portage Northern unfairly and inaccurately, mostly due to how casually these highly-sensitive articles were written. The heavily-biased articles regarding this case provided limited, skewed information that shed only negative light on the school, failing to report the sheer joy that was shared at Friday night’s football game when a beloved senior classmate with special needs was crowned homecoming king and instead skipping straight to the coverage of the motorcycle escort at the school on Monday morning. Was it a simple oversight or due to the fact that it didn’t fit into the narrative that was already establishing PN as a place where that kind of thing “wouldn’t” happen?
Many details that were important to understanding the entire situation were simply disregarded or omitted by reporters. WWMT should have taken a more professional stance towards this sensitive subject of bullying, and in doing so considered all of the factors and facets of the situation. Earlier today, for example, they simply interviewed the bikers that escorted Julian Martinez to school. The reporter did not talk to students coming in or the parents dropping their children off amid what became an increasingly chaotic scene. They also did not discuss how the police had to come to provide oversight on an event that was confusing and even frightening to parents and students. Throughout the day, students discussed feeling scared and uncertain coming into school this morning, and eyewitnesses described parents who saw the chaos and simply drove away without dropping their kids off. None of this, which details the negative effects that the motorcycle escort had on the school environment, was included in WWMT’s report.
The coverage, while perhaps well-intentioned, has sensationalized the issue with minimal merit and credibility. Even in our student publication, our journalistic standards suggest that news stories should have at least three sources. These articles did not do that, nor did they indicate a non-biased, fair, and balanced approach by thoroughly interviewing individuals on both sides of the story.
As stated by the district, Portage Northern has taken the accusations seriously and has thoroughly investigated the situation. Due to student privacy laws, the district could not legally release the kind of information that could potentially have vindicated the school of the supposed wrongdoing, but it was noted in one of the WWMT articles that after extensive research, administrators were unable to determine who broke the phone. This information, mentioned in passing though an integral part of the narrative, was lost in WWMT’s coverage.
As a news staff and as a school, we are disappointed in the poor journalism and lack of ethics and integrity displayed by our trusted local news source in reporting on this situation. While it has strengthened our resolve to know that even as a high schoolers, we are capable of separating true journalistic practice from fake news well enough to discredit the quality of the articles that have put our school under attack, we still grieve with the students who are dealing with the fallout of our school being portrayed so recklessly, inaccurately, and unfairly.
We want to be clear: we stand firmly against bullying. If there was a situation where students, teachers, and administrators were genuinely ignoring the mistreatment of a special needs student, or any student for that matter, we would be on the forefront of holding those responsible accountable to create an environment that is better for everyone.
We also, however, stand against journalistic malpractice and news outlets who report only part of the story, manipulate the feelings and opinions of their viewers, and make situations worse instead of better. Our message to WWMT: West Michigan and the staff and students of Portage Northern deserve better.
-The Northern Light
UPDATE: Thank you for your comments and feedback. Unfortunately, comments containing swear words or other inappropriate content cannot be published on this student forum, but we have read and taken into account all comments. We are currently researching for an in-depth online feature article on bullying here at PN, which will delve into our bullying statistics, referral rates, and the legal process schools have to follow when it comes to handling alleged bullying situations. Stay tuned for this information.
Ryan McCune • Sep 10, 2020 at 1:38 pm
I agree that WWMT is way out of line for this they are suppose to be a legitimate news station. The fact that professionals had to be corrected by high schoolers is absolutely embarrassing. I am very glad that the students of PN stood up and brought this to our attention.
Grace Culp • Sep 24, 2019 at 3:02 pm
I agree that they could’ve looked into the story more, and it wasn’t great journalism. I knew little of what happened in Julien’s case. However, Portage Northern really does nothing to combat bullying. I’ve seen things, I’ve reported them to the principals, with evidence, and still, no action is taken. There is bullying going on in person, and online and even when I’ve shown them what has been done they say they’ll “take care of it”. But I’m not sure what they’ve taken care of. Bullying has been going on in this school before we were here and it will continue to happen without consequences if our staff continues to turn the other way.
Scotty Melvin • Oct 4, 2017 at 4:09 pm
Congrats to all of you who put this piece together. Always speak your mind. The media today is not the media I grew up with. Be vigilant, and responsible.
Meg • Oct 2, 2017 at 10:32 am
Bravo! One thousand times, bravo! I love that high school journalists are calling “professional” journalists out on this. Shoddy reporting happens all too often and greatly contributes to the mess this country is in.
Ellen • Sep 27, 2017 at 6:07 pm
This is a good start – however, I hope you don’t end your journalistic work here. Just pointing out that the coverage was poor from a journalistic standpoint (and I agree that it was) is one thing, but the facts that there are multiple facets to this issue and that a badly done news story was shown don’t negate the experiences of kids who may have been bullied.
Reactions to this on social media make it clear that some are interpreting it as a denial that bullying ever happens at the school. Reporting it and not being believed is likely one of a bullied student’s worst fears. It would be great to see a followup where you allow a student to do some more in-depth reporting on the issue of bullying and the response to it in general.
Rachel • Sep 26, 2017 at 7:02 pm
For news staff and/or students: I hate to pick. I served on the newspaper staff at PCJH, PCHS, and Michigan State University as a journalism and political science major. (Yes, I know this is petty. But as one of my professors said, if you want a perfect score, write a perfect paper.) Second to last paragraph, “If it were,” not “If it was…”
Gonzalo Garreton • Sep 26, 2017 at 5:31 pm
To the Staff at Northern Light. Great piece, very repetitive but great in showing another perspective on a very sensitive issue. Although I do agree with you on the lack of substance WWMT reporters used in properly portraying a delicate matter, their point is well taken. If they would have done their proper in depth investigation and broaden their scope to local schools it would have been better. For someone who never has been bullied, harassed or being the subject of racist behavior is very hard to understand how one that has suffered this feels. I have personal experience with these issues at Portage Public Schools by students, staff and administrators in the past. So although WWMT erred in their reporting they were trying to highlight an issue that PPS has tried for years to eradicate but has failed to do so completely. Or in some instances wait for the person to retire hoping the problem will go away. Remember the seeds you plant is what you reap. Let’s continue to plant Fairness, Equality, Inclusion, and Love for our fellow human beings and we will reap the best generation of PPS students ever.
Liam Michael • Sep 26, 2017 at 5:29 pm
Well written article. I support your pursuit of quality journalism and congratulate you on your willingness to take on a news organization much larger than your own for the purpose of encouraging journalistic integrity.
When reading the WWMT article, however, it was a tangential subject that caught my attention — that of Portage Public Schools’ students right to freedom of speech.
As an alumni of PNHS, I have always been in strong opposition to the district’s code of conduct with regard to their flagrant disregard for the constitutional rights of their students.
Students attending Portage Public Schools are required to relinquish their rights to privacy, guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment, as well as their rights to freedom of speech, guaranteed by the First Amendment.
I have always held, and always will hold the belief that a student should not be required to relinquish these rights in order to attend a public school.
My concern regarding the WWMT article was not that Portage Northern was neglecting to investigate bullying–I know for a fact that they take bullying very seriously, and I have always respected that. However, I also know that PNHS has a history of censoring their students on social media–and this is where I take issue with PNHS.
Quite frankly, I couldn’t care less if a student makes a social media post during school hours or not–it is not right for a school to censor their students for any reason barring direct threats of violence.
Hearing that the administration at PNHS was threatening a student with suspension for a social media post, lest they take down the post, was abhorrent.
I know that the staff at the Northern Light is made up of well-informed, passionate, and skilled writers and I would hope that your bravery would extend to calling attention to the censorship that PNHS commits against its students.
Thank you for your hard work, and keep it up!
Terri • Sep 26, 2017 at 12:04 pm
Great article. I have to disagree though with the statement that WWMT is “a trusted local news source”. They do not check all facts and have been known to “sensationalizing” the event without considering those involved. PNHS is a great school.
Joanne Willson • Sep 26, 2017 at 11:06 am
As a parent and grand parent of 4 NHS grads, I continue to follow you on twitter – great job! Agreed journalism at it’s best
Haily McCoy • Sep 26, 2017 at 8:56 am
I’m really proud of the hard work the journalism 2 staff showed in composing this article. I too felt that WWMT did not cover the entire story. Good job guys.
Liam Fagan • Sep 26, 2017 at 8:55 am
amazing story. So glad that someone is sticking up for Northern! The reporting by channel 3 was biased, and I’m glad there is published work acknowledging that